Head-to-head
Make (formerly Integromat) vs Zapier
Features, strengths, and a clear verdict for teams choosing their stack.
Automation/WorkflowAutomation/Workflow
The quick verdict
Winner
Zapier
“Zapier wins for most teams that want reliable app-to-app automation fast; Make wins when you need complex multi-step logic visually.”
Feature matchup
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Largest app directory | — | ✓ |
| Visual scenario builder for complex branches | ✓ | — |
| Operations pricing efficiency at volume | ✓ | — |
| Fastest time-to-first-automation | — | ✓ |
| Advanced data transformation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Enterprise governance & SSO maturity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Beginner onboarding docs & community | — | ✓ |
Make (formerly Integromat)
Pros
- ✓Powerful visual builder for multi-path workflows
- ✓Often cheaper per operation for complex scenarios
- ✓Strong data mapping and iterators/aggregators
Cons
- ✕Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
- ✕Smaller app ecosystem than Zapier
Zapier
Pros
- ✓Huge integration catalog and templates
- ✓Simple trigger → action model teams already know
- ✓Excellent docs and ecosystem momentum
Cons
- ✕Task-based pricing can get costly at high volume
- ✕Complex branching is less elegant than Make scenarios